Congressional Research Service Reports Redistributed as a Service of the NLE*
|
|
IB92059 - Civilian Nuclear Waste Disposal (pdf)
11-Jan-2002; Mark Holt;
19 p.
Update: Energy Secretary Abraham notified the Governor of
Nevada on January 10, 2002, that he would recommend to the President
that a national repository for highly radioactive waste be constructed
beneath Nevada’s Yucca Mountain. Under the Nuclear Waste Policy
Act, Abraham’s recommendation to the President must wait until
30 days after Nevada has been notified. The recommendation is based
on revised site suitability guidelines issued by the Department
of Energy (DOE) November 14. The State of Nevada filed a lawsuit
December 17 contending that the revised guidelines relied too much
on waste packages and other engineered barriers rather than geological
features to prevent radioactive releases. A December report by the
General Accounting Office (GAO) had urged that more research be
completed before the Secretary of Energy made a recommendation on
Yucca Mountain. The controversial GAO report (GAO-02-191) concluded
that the repository may not be ready to open until 2015 –
5 years later than DOE’s current target. The FY2002 Energy
and Water Development Appropriations bill (H.R. 2311, H.Rept. 107-258,
P.L. 107-66), signed by the President on November 12, provides $375
million for DOE’s civilian nuclear waste disposal program,
which is responsible for work at the Yucca Mountain site. That funding
level is about $15 million below the FY2001 base appropriation and
$70 million below the Bush Administration’s request, although
it is $100 million above the initial Senate-passed level.
Abstract: Management of civilian radioactive waste has
posed difficult issues for Congress since the beginning of the
nuclear power industry in the 1950s. Although federal policy is
based on the premise that nuclear waste can be disposed of safely,
new storage and disposal facilities for all types of radioactive
waste have frequently been delayed or blocked by concerns about
safety, health, and the environment. Civilian radioactive waste
ranges from the highly radioactive spent fuel from nuclear power
plants to the far-less-radioactive uranium mill tailings that
result from the processing of uranium ore. Most of the debate
over civilian waste disposal focuses on spent fuel and on “low
level” waste from nuclear power plants, medical institutions,
civilian research facilities, and industry. The Nuclear Waste
Policy Act of 1982 (NWPA) calls for disposal of spent nuclear
fuel in a repository in a deep geologic formation that is unlikely
to be disturbed for thousands of years. NWPA established an office
in the Department of Energy (DOE) to develop such a repository
and required the program’s civilian costs to be covered
by a fee on nuclear-generated electricity, paid into the Nuclear
Waste Fund. Amendments to NWPA in 1987 restricted DOE’s
repository site studies to Yucca Mountain in Nevada. DOE is studying
numerous scientific issues in determining the suitability of Yucca
Mountain for a nuclear waste repository, which must be licensed
by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Questions about the
site include the likelihood of earthquakes, volcanoes, groundwater
contamination, and human intrusion. NWPA’s goal for loading
waste into the repository was 1998, but DOE does not expect to
open the facility until 2010 at the earliest. DOE issued a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the Yucca Mountain site in
July 1999 and plans to apply for an NRC license in 2003 to build
the repository. However, recent press reports indicate that the
license application is unlikely to be submitted before 2004. DOE
requested $445 million for the program in FY2002, an increase
of more than $50 million from the FY2001 base appropriation. The
final FY2002 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill
(H.R. 2311, H.Rept. 107-258, P.L. 107-66), signed by the President
November 12, 2001, provides $375 million for the program. Low-level
waste sites are a state responsibility under the Low-Level Radioactive
Waste Policy Act of 1980. Pursuant to that act, 10 regional compacts
for disposal of low-level waste have been approved by Congress,
most recently a compact among Texas, Maine, and Vermont. Only
three commercial low-level waste sites are currently operating,
in the states of South Carolina, Utah, and Washington. The Washington
facility is accepting waste just from within the Northwest and
Rocky Mountain regional compacts, and the Utah site accepts only
the least-concentrated class of low-level waste, although it has
received preliminary approval to accept the other major low-level
waste classes as well. [read
report]
|
*
These CRS reports were produced by the Congressional Research Service, a branch of the Library of Congress providing nonpartisan research reports to members of the House and Senate. The National Council for Science and the Environment (NCSE) has made these reports available to the public at large, but the Congressional Research Service is not affiliated with the NCSE or the National Library for the Environment (NLE). This web site is not endorsed by or associated with the Congressional Research Service. The material contained in the CRS reports does not necessarily express the views of NCSE, its supporters, or sponsors. The information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. NCSE disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall NCSE be liable for any damages.
|
|