Congressional Research Service Reports Redistributed as a Service of the NLE*
|
|
IB10032 - Transportation Issues in the 108th Congress (pdf)
3-May-2002; David R. Peterman; 18 p.
Update: September 23, 2003
MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On September 17, 2003, the Senate Committee on Finance passed a five-month
extension of authority for trust fund expenditures on surface transportation programs (S.
1548). The bill would also make changes to Highway Trust Fund revenue sources, adding
about $2 billion a year to the Fund. The same day, the House Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure introduced two bills that would extend the authority for trust fund
expenditures on surface transportation programs, one for five months (H.R. 3087), one for
six months (H.R. 3088).
On September 17, 2003, the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
reported out a bill (H.R. 2572) reauthorizing Amtrak for 3 years (FY2004-FY2006) at $2
billion each year, with no changes to Amtraks structure.
On September 9, 2003, the House of Representatives passed their version of the
FY2004 Transportation, Treasury, and IndependentAgencies Appropriations bill (H.R. 2989)
by a vote of 381-39. The bill provides $54.9 billion for transportation programs. The major
difference between the House and the Administration request was an additional $4.4 billion
for highway funding (another major difference, the deletion of the $3.4 billion Airport
Improvement Program, was the result of a technicality; the program is likely to be restored
in conference).
On September 4, 2003, the Senate Committee onAppropriations ordered reported their
version of the FY2004 Transportation, Treasury, and Independent Agencies Appropriations
bill (S. 1589; S.Rept. 108-146). The Committee recommended $58.9 billion for
transportation programs, an 8.6% increase over the Administration request. The major
difference was an additional $4.5 billion for highway funding.
On June 11, 2003, the House passed H.R. 2115, Flight 100 Century of Aviation
Reauthorization Act, which calls for spending $58.2 billion over 4 years. The next day the
Senate passed is version of H.R. 2115, as amended by S. 824, proposing spending $43.5
billion over 3 years. Conferees reached agreement on July 24, 2003; however, the
conference report is not yet available. Opposition to several aspects of the agreement in both
houses has thrown its approval into doubt.
Previous release:
/NLE/CRSreports/03May/IB10032.pdf
- /NLE/CRSreports/03Apr/IB10032.pdf
- /NLE/CRSreports/02Dec/IB10032.pdf
- http://cnie.org/NLE/CRSreports/IB10032.pdf
- http://www.cnie.org/nle/crsreports/transportation/trans-21.pdf
- http://www.cnie.org/nle/crsreports/transportation/trans-21.cfm
Abstract:
This issue brief identifies key transportation issues facing the
108th Congress.
Transportation Budget. The Administration requested $54.3 billion for the
Department of Transportation for FY2004, 2.5% less than comparable
funding for FY2003. The House of Representatives has approved
$54.9 billion; the Senate Appropriations Committee has recommended
$58.9 billion. With the end of the fiscal year approaching, and
several appropriations bills still unsettled, a Continuing Resolution
is likely.
Surface Transportation Reauthorization.
Authorizing legislation for the existing federal
highway and transit programs will expire at
the end of FY2003. Provisions in that law
will shut down or significantly limit DOTs
largest programs after September 30, 2003, if
not amended. TheAdministrations proposal,
the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient
Transportation Equity Act of 2003
(SAFETEA, H.R. 2088/S. 1072), calls for
only minimal increases in program spending
over the next six years, and calls for a decrease
in year-over-year spending in FY2004.
The committees of jurisdiction have not yet
introduced their proposals; both houses want
more funding than proposed bytheAdministrations
plan. Bills to extend the programs for
5-6 months have been introduced.
Aviation Reauthorization. The authorization
for key functions of the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) will expire at the end
of FY2003. The FAAs bill, theCentennial of
Flight AviationAuthorization (FLIGHT-100),
provides for essentially flat funding during the
next four years. On June 11, 2003, the House
passed H.R. 2115, Flight 100 Century of
Aviation Reauthorization Act, which calls for
spending $58.2 billion over 4 years. The next
day the Senate passed is version of H.R. 2115,
as amended by S. 824, proposing spending
$43.5 billion over 3 years. Conferees reached
agreement on July 24, 2003; however, opposition
in both houses to aspects of the agreement
have delayed its consideration.
Transportation Security. Transportation
security continues to be a key policy issue for
Congress. The overarching concern is what
reasonable security actions can be taken in
each transportation mode without excessively
impeding commerce and travel. Congress
continues to consider legislative proposals to
strengthen aviation and surface transportation
security.
Amtrak Issues. Amtrak has said it needs
$1.8 billion for FY2004. The Administration
requested $900 million; the House has approved
$900 million, while the Senate
Appropriations Committee recommended $1.3
billion. Amtraks authorization expired at the
end of FY2002; Congress is considering
reauthorization. In doing so, it may consider
altering the shape of the railroad, including
Amtraks long-haul routes.
Airline IndustryTurmoil. The economyand
world events have dramatically affected the
airline industry. The airlines lost record
amounts of money in 2002, which followed
what had been the previous record loss experienced
in 2001. Congress has proposed providing
some short-term relief for the ailing
airline industry.
[read
report]
|
*
These CRS reports were produced by the Congressional Research Service, a branch of the Library of Congress providing nonpartisan research reports to members of the House and Senate. The National Council for Science and the Environment (NCSE) has made these reports available to the public at large, but the Congressional Research Service is not affiliated with the NCSE or the National Library for the Environment (NLE). This web site is not endorsed by or associated with the Congressional Research Service. The material contained in the CRS reports does not necessarily express the views of NCSE, its supporters, or sponsors. The information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. NCSE disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall NCSE be liable for any damages.
|
|