 |
|
 |
| |
-
Minimizing the Genes for Grammar. The Minimalist Program as a Biological
Framework for the Study of Language
Lorenzo, Guillermo; Longa, Victor M Lingua, 2003, 113, 7, July,
643-657 This paper examines the main ideas of the Minimalist Program (MP)
with the aim of evaluating its virtues as a biological framework for the
understanding of human language. Our conclusions are basically three.
First, the MP favors a certain reconciliation between the abstract
characterization of language & characterizations derived from other
biological concerns. Second, the MP reduces the role of the genetic
endowment for language & relies more on epigenetic processes, in clear
agreement with other aspects of the study of the brain. Third, the MP
favors an essential identification of the processes of ontogenetic &
phylogenetic development of language, a rather controversial conclusion but
also a very important one from a theoretical point of view. 49 References.
Adapted from the source document
-
Language Evolution: Consensus and Controversies
Christiansen, Morten H; Kirby, Simon Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003,
7, 7, July, 300-307 Why is language the way it is? How did language come
to be this way? & Why is our species alone in having complex language?
These are old, unsolved questions that have seen a renaissance in the
dramatic recent growth in research being published on the origins &
evolution of human language. This review provides a broad overview of some
of the important current work in this area. We highlight new methodologies
(eg, computational modeling), emerging points of consensus (eg, the
importance of pre-adaptation), & the major remaining controversies (eg,
gestural origins of language). We also discuss why language evolution is
such a difficult problem & suggest probable directions research may take in
the near future. 1 Figure, 2 Boxes, 69 References. Adapted from the source
document
-
Rule Learning by Cotton-Top Tamarins
Hauser, Marc D; Weiss, Daniel; Marcus, Gary Cognition, 2002, 86, 1, Nov,
B15-B22 Previous work suggests that human infants are capable of rapidly
generalizing patterns that have been characterized as abstract algebraic
rules (Marcus et al, 1999), a process that may play a pivotal role in
language acquisition. Here we explore whether this capacity is uniquely
human & evolved specifically for the computational problems associated with
language, or whether this mechanism is shared with other species, &
therefore evolved for problems other than language. We used the same
materials & methods that were originally employed in tests of human infants
to assess whether cotton-top tamarin monkeys can extract abstract algebraic
rules. Specifically, we habituated subjects to sequences of consonant-vowel
syllables that followed one of two patterns, AAB (eg, wi wi di) or ABB (le
we we). Following habituation, we presented subjects with two novel test
items, one with the same pattern as that presented during habituation & one
with a different pattern. Like human infants, tamarins were more likely to
dishabituate to the test item with a different pattern. We conclude that
the capacity to generalize rule-like patterns, at least at the level
demonstrated, did not evolve specifically for language acquisition, though
it remains possible that infants might use such rules during language
acquisition. 2 Figures, 30 References. Adapted from the source document
-
On the Construction of the Concept 'Language': Entrenched Conceptual
Integration Networks Encountered in Evolutionary Biology and Language
Evolution
Frank, Roslyn M Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication,
2002, 3, 23, Aug, 55 In recent years the relationship between language
change & biological evolution has captured the attention of investigators
operating in different disciplines, particularly evolutionary biology &
ALife (Zeimke, 2001; Hull, 2001), as well as linguistics (Croft, 2000;
Sinha, 1999), with each group often bringing radically different
conceptualizations of the object under study, namely, "language" itself, to
the debate. Over the centuries, meanings associated with the expression
"language" have been influenced by mappings of conceptual frames & inputs
from the biological sciences onto the entity referred to as "language." At
the same time the prestige of the science of linguistics created a feedback
mechanism by which the referentiality of language, at each stage, was
mapped back into the field of evolutionary biology along with the emergent
structures of the resulting blend. While significant energy has been spent
on identifying ways in which biological evolution has been linked to
concepts of language evolution (Dorries, 2002), little attention has been
directed to the nature of the conceptual integration networks that have
been produced in the process. This paper examines the way conceptual
integration theory can be brought to bear on the blends that have been
created, focusing primarily on examples drawn from recent debates, eg,
language viewed as "a lingueme pool" (Croft, 2000). Adapted from the source
document
-
The Potential Neandertal Vowel Space Was as Large as That of Modern
Humans
Boe, Louis-Jean; Heim, Jean-Louis; Honda, Kiyoshi; Maeda, Shinji Journal
of Phonetics, 2002, 30, 3, July, 465-484 Since Lieberman & Crelin (1971)
postulated the theory that Neandertals "could not produce the range of
sounds that characterize human speech," the potential speech capability of
Neandertals has been the subject of hot debate. Lieberman & Crelin claimed
that the development of a low laryngeal position was a necessary condition
for the realization of a sufficient number of vocalic contrasts, since the
potential vowel space was enlarged due to an enlarged pharyngeal cavity.
Like newborn infants, Neandertals did not possess this "anatomical basis of
speech," & therefore could not speak. Lieberman & Crelin further claimed
that this fact may have caused the, otherwise mysterious, extinction of the
Neandertal. In this study, we refute the articulatory & acoustic arguments
developed by Lieberman & Crelin in their theory. Using a new
anthropomorphic articulatory model, we infer that the vowel space of the
Neandertal male was no smaller than that of a modern human, & we present
vowel simulations to corroborate this hypothesis. Our study is strictly
limited to the morphological & acoustic aspects of the vocal tract, & we
cannot therefore offer any definitive answer to the question of whether
Neandertals spoke or not. However, we do feel safe in claiming that
Neandertals were not morphologically handicapped for speech. A low larynx
(& large pharynx) cannot be considered to be the "anatomical prerequisites
for producing the full range of human speech." There is, therefore, no
reason to believe that the lowering of the larynx & a concomitant increase
in pharynx size are necessary evolutionary preadaptations for speech. 4
Tables, 8 Figures, 57 References. [Copyright 2002 Academic Press.]
-
The Selection of Languages: Darwinism and Linguistics
Bergounioux, Gabriel Langages, 2002, 146, June, 7-18 The mutual
interrelationship between the Darwinian theory & linguistics is explored,
considering, from a historical perspective, how one scientific paradigm
influenced the other. The fragile status of linguistics as a scientific
field of inquiry & academic discipline at the time of the publication of
Charles Darwin's Origin of Species (1876) is noted, describing the
history-oriented grammar based on both anthropology & comparative
mythology, which was practiced in France & Germany. The attractiveness of
the ideas expounded in Darwin's treatise to linguists is noted, identifying
the concepts particularly fertile for linguistic reinterpretation. August
Schleicher's (1868) & Arsene Darmesteter's (1886) linguistic Darwinism is
outlined. The reflection of contemporary, 19th-century linguistic ideas in
Darwin's The Descent of Man (1871) is illustrated with some of the English
naturalist's linguistic conjectures. The impact of the Darwinian theory on
20th-century linguistics is recognized, quoting & critiquing the major
tenets of the neo-Darwinian paradigm. 34 References. Adapted from the
source document
-
The Emergence of Phonological Systems
Carre, Rene Langages, 2002, 146, June, 70-79 An acoustic tube model is
proposed to account for the origin of sound communication between humans.
It is demonstrated how an 18-centimeter-long tube deforms automatically to
produce sounds with both economy of effort & maximum acoustic contrast
between phonemic units. Air flow functions predict precisely the production
(articulation) places for vowels & consonants & identify the physical bases
for phonological distinctions. A comparison with human speech organs
demonstrates a significant overlap between the modeled conduit &
articulation physiology. Significant parallels & phoneme correspondences
obtain between the computed sound trajectories & languages with different
vowel systems. 4 Figures, 28 References. Adapted from the source document
-
The Shannon Function of Language: A Clue to Its Evolution
Dessalles, Jean-Louis Langages, 2002, 146, June, 101-111 It is argued
that communication of salient events was the principal mechanism
responsible for language development & the single factor responsible for
its evolutionary transition from prelanguage to protolanguage to language
stages. This hypothesis provides an alternative account to Derek
Bickerton's (1990) theory of language origin in which protolanguage was
devoid of syntactic organization while this functional component was added
at the stage of natural languages as we know them today. The term "Shannon
function" is proposed for designating this pragmatic characteristic of
human communicative behavior, referring to Claude Elwood Shannon's (1948)
communication theory in which the probability of informing about salient
events can be computed using a mathematical formula. Evidence is produced
from child language acquisition & adults' spontaneous verbal interactions
to demonstrate that the Shannon behavior can still be observed in modern
humans today. The following, three-phase scenario is proposed for the
development of human language: (1) the emergence of prelanguage based on
deictic gesticulation & isolated words to refer to salient events
immediately perceptible, (2) the emergence of protolanguage in which word
meanings are combined to evoke salient events absent but verifiable, & (3)
the emergence of language proper facilitating references to salient events
both absent & nonverifiable. 1 Appendix, 26 References. Adapted from the
source document
-
Homo narrans: The Role of Narration in the Emergence of Language
Victorri, Bernard Langages, 2002, 146, June, 112-125 It is argued that
the narrative function is the single most responsible factor conditioning
the transition from protolanguage to language proper (as we know it today)
in the evolutionary history of human language. This hypothesis shares the
functionalist view on language origin espoused by M. Donald (1991) & C.
Knight (1991) but contests the structuralist & cognitive accounts of S.
Pinker (1994) & Derek Bickerton (1998). The homo narrans theory also
provides an elegant account for the mysterious disappearance of all hominid
predecessors & subspecies of humans in their evolutionary history (eg, the
extinction of homo sapiens neanderthalensis). According to this account,
the narrative capacity of homo sapiens sapiens enabled only this species to
survive the violent crises of social deregulation by creating social laws
through mythical & religious discourse. Three advantages of the narrative
hypothesis are pointed out: (1) It explains the peculiar syntactic &
semantic properties of natural languages. (2) It is compatible with the
history of the last stages of hominid evolution. (3) It accounts for the
emergence of a new type of social organization specific to humans in which
sociocultural laws replace the sociobiological constraints governing the
animal kingdom. 51 References. Adapted from the source document
-
The Evolution of Talk and the Emergence of Complex Society
Zimmer, J Raymond Semiotica, 2002, 138, 1-4, 205-233 A semiotic account
of the evolution of language & society is argued to be reflected in the
archaeological record of the last eight millennia in the Near East, Europe,
& the Americas. In light of theories separating the format of language from
its evolution, it is proposed that grammatical competence evolved in the
format of manual-brachial gestures, termed hand talk, prior to the
speciation leading to Homo sapiens. During the latter process, social
selection favored the addition of vocal gesture or speech talk to hand talk
to create a mixed format termed hand speech that acted as a cognitive brake
on social development beyond the undifferentiated village level. Hand
speech was characteristic of Homo sapiens until the developed Neolithic
period, when speech-alone talk was adopted as a technical innovation
motivated by increased power & wealth & potentiated the emergence of
complex societies. 104 References. J. Hitchcock
-
LANGUAGE, BANANAS AND BONOBOS: LINGUISTIC PROBLEMS, PUZZLES AND
POLEMICS
Smith, Neil viii+150pp, UK: Blackwell, 2002 This book presents a series
of essays on language concerns such as human knowledge & use of language,
political correctness, & the linguistic abilities of chimpanzees. Bibliog.
Adapted from the source document
-
Some Features That Make Mirror Neurons and Human Language Faculty
Unique
Stamenov, Maxim I MIRROR NEURONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF BRAIN AND LANGUAGE,
Stamenov, Maxim I., & Gallese, Vittorio [Eds], Amsterdam: John Benjamins,
pp 249-271 Mirror neuron systems are argued to implement resonance-based
attunement to a class of actions, ie, a direct rapport between agent's &
observer's body members acting in the here-&-now; mirror neurons track
action per se, & there is no evidence from current studies that agent &
observer are either distinguished or subsequently identified through the
discharge of mirror neurons. Consequently, the fitness of mirror neuron
systems for communication is called into question; there is no
correspondence with the properties of the linguistic self-actor or the
transitive patient, & the structure of the action that is enacted/echoed by
mirror neurons is rigid & cannot be extended in the manner of syntactic
structures. The basic evolutionary function of mirror neurons is to
simulate a programmed action, predicting its consequences & thereby
achieving a superior control strategy. The event structure, theta
structure, & syntactic structure of a verbally coded event involve multiple
mapping with massive feedback & -forward processes in working memory &
require a totally different cognitive architecture from mirror neuron
systems. 26 References. J. Hitchcock
-
On the Pre-Linguistic Origins of Language Processing Rates
Barker, Marjorie; Givon, T THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE OUT OF PRE-LANGUAGE,
Givon, T., & Malle, Bertram F. [Eds], Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp
171-214 In light of evidence from oral communication data,
psycholinguistic experiments, & neurological activation measurements
showing that clauses & lexical words are processed at a remarkably stable
rate of 1.0 sec & 250 msec respectively, the possibility that these rates
reflect prelinguistic constraints on visual information processing is
investigated in two experiments designed to test hypotheses that episodic
memory will decay rapidly at presentation rates below 1 sec for individual
events & 250 msec for individual objects. Cartoon sequence stimuli were
used in experiment 1 (N = 50) to present core events of stories & in
experiment 2 (N = 35) to present individual events with varied
participants; presentation rates were varied from 2 sec to 32 msec per
cartoon, & after a distractor task Ss retold stories in experiment 1 &
recalled participants in experiment 2. Results confirm that the rhythms of
conscious/episodic recall of visual events & objects substantially coincide
with those of clause & word processing, respectively. 12 Appendixes, 42
References. J. Hitchcock
-
Looking for Neural Answers to Linguistic Questions
Bichakjian, Bernard H MIRROR NEURONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF BRAIN AND
LANGUAGE, Stamenov, Maxim I., & Gallese, Vittorio [Eds], Amsterdam: John
Benjamins, pp 323-331 It is argued that a true understanding of language
can only be achieved in terms of evolution & that linguists therefore need
to become familiar with evolutionary reasoning, just as evolutionists need
to be knowledgeable about pervasive changes in human language over the last
10,000 years; eg, the unidirectional development of head-last order to
head-first order, when viewed from an evolutionary perspective, is
explained as a shift from a holistic perceptual mode characteristic of
prelinguistic humans to the analytic conceptual mode of language users.
Similarly, the historical reversal of the direction of writing from
right-to-left to left-to-right reflects the attentional direction of the
respective right & left cerebral hemispheres. It is suggested that the
mirror neuron system in Broca's area was pressed into speech motor control
duties as the language faculty was evolving in the left lateral frontal
cortex. 1 Figure, 27 References. J. Hitchcock
-
The Internal Structure of the Syllable: An Ontogenetic Perspective on
Origins
Davis, Barbara L; MacNeilage, Peter F THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE OUT OF
PRE-LANGUAGE, Givon, T., & Malle, Bertram F. [Eds], Amsterdam: John
Benjamins, pp 135-153 Recent studies of infant vocalization are argued to
confirm Davis & MacNeilage's hypothesis that the ontogeny of speech
commences with a pattern of frame dominance, based on vocalization during
repeated mandibular opening & closing movements, whereby preference is
given to three intrasyllabic frames: (1) coronal consonant + front vowel,
(2) dorsal consonant + back vowel, & (3) labial consonant + central vowel;
in accordance with a principle of motor inertia that accounts for (1) &
(2), (3) appears to reflect the resting position of the tongue. These
patterns are more robust in infants' productions than in the environmental
input or in the early target lexicon & are strongly confirmed across
languages; it is suggested that (1-3) may represent the earliest
syllable-like organization of hominid vocal production. 2 Tables, 78
References. J. Hitchcock
-
The Clausal Structure of Linguistic and Pre-Linguistic Behavior
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud; Fenk, August THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE OUT OF
PRE-LANGUAGE, Givon, T., & Malle, Bertram F. [Eds], Amsterdam: John
Benjamins, pp 215-229 Previous studies by Fenk-Oczlon & Fenk & by other
investigators are reviewed to show that the receptive processing &
production of language is executed by central nervous mechanisms that
evolved prelinguistically to control other activities. A universal
phenomenon of human action, including work, ritual, & physical routines, is
the division of behaviors or units of action into functionally related
segments with optimum durations of approximately 2 sec for action units &
200-300 msec for segments & seven plus or minus two segments per action
unit. This pattern of rhythmic processing is also observed across languages
when the clause or intonation unit is taken as the action unit & the
syllable as the segment; in Fenk-Oczlon & Fenk's (1999) survey of 34
languages, all but Japanese had perception & production rates of 5-9
syllables per clause. Implications of a negative cross-linguistic
correlation of syllable duration & syllable complexity are considered in
this connection. 1 Figure, 52 References. J. Hitchcock
-
The Visual Information-Processing System as an Evolutionary Precursor of
Human Language
Givon, T THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE OUT OF PRE-LANGUAGE, Givon, T., &
Malle, Bertram F. [Eds], Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp 3-50 In light of
debate between extreme innatist & extreme emergentist positions on the
evolution of language, it is argued that, if preexisting neural modules
were enlisted for linguistic tasks, at a minimum new neural metacircuitry
was necessary for coordination & switching. A functional-adaptive
perspective on human communication is outlined, & the primate visual
information-processing system is compared with what can reasonably be
assumed regarding language-related neural circuits. It is hypothesized that
three major components evolved successively from the visual
information-processing system: (1) the cognitive representation modules of
semantic memory & episodic memory, present in nonhuman primates & simply
expanded in humans; (2) the peripheral lexical code, which was a
visual-gestural system at first, constructed from preexisting systems for
visual object recognition & visual representation of complex manual
routines; & (3) the grammatical code, which may have preceded or followed
the shift of (2) to auditory-oral coding & integrates at least six
preexisting capacities, including a cross-modal lexicon & cross-modal
episodic memory, a combinatorial semantics module, the manual dexterity
module of (2), modality-specific working memory & executive attention
systems, & perspective-shifting right cortical modules. 4 Figures, 198
References. J. Hitchcock
-
The Co-Evolution of Language and Working Memory Capacity in the Human
Brain
Gruber, Oliver MIRROR NEURONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF BRAIN AND LANGUAGE,
Stamenov, Maxim I., & Gallese, Vittorio [Eds], Amsterdam: John Benjamins,
pp 77-86 Evidence that the evolution of language functions, working
memory, & other human cognitive functions is linked to that of premotor
cortices is provided by findings of two functional magnetic resonance
imaging experiments using articulatory suppression for comparability with
nonhuman primate studies. Experiment 1 (N = 11), described in Gruber (2000)
& Gruber (2001), alternated a verbal item-recognition task with a letter
case judgment task in three conditions: silent counting, finger tapping, &
no additional task; experiment 2, described by Gruber & D. Y. Von Cramon
(2001), used similar tasks & introduced variation between short-term memory
of letters vs letter colors & fonts. Results indicate that visual working
memory & phonological storage under articulatory suppression activate
distinct prefronto-parietal networks with differential distribution through
identical neural structures, suggesting an evolutionarily older multimodal
working memory system with domain-specialized substructures that is shared
with nonhuman primates & contrasts with the premotor speech areas that
mediate verbal rehearsal & probably developed during the evolution of
language. 4 Figures, 22 References. J. Hitchcock
-
The Mirror System and Joint Action
Knoblich, Gunther; Jordan, Jerome Scott MIRROR NEURONS AND THE EVOLUTION
OF BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, Stamenov, Maxim I., & Gallese, Vittorio [Eds],
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp 115-124 A link between the evolution of the
language faculty & the capacity for joint action is suggested in light of
(1) the discovery of a mirror neuron system in macaques that enables them
to match peers' actions with their own & (2) macaques' inability to imitate
or to participate flexibly in effective joint actions. A model for the
modulation of actions in response to perceptions of the effects of others'
actions is supported in a summary of experiments using a tracking task with
individuals & groups (N = 35 each) under two conditions, presence vs
absence of a tone for each individual key press to accelerate or decelerate
the tracker on a computer screen. Results show that the acoustic signal
greatly facilitated anticipatory brake rates for groups in the second &
third trial blocks, compared to a minor facilitation effect for individuals
across all trial blocks; this finding is interpreted as evidence that
groups' actions are as well coordinated as those of individuals only when
joint vs individual effects are clearly distinguishable. 5 Figures, 11
References. J. Hitchcock
-
Missing Links, Issues and Hypotheses in the Evolutionary Origin of
Language
Li, Charles N THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE OUT OF PRE-LANGUAGE, Givon, T., &
Malle, Bertram F. [Eds], Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp 83-106 As crucial
evolutionary divergences from other primates limited early hominids to the
open savanna, where predators & prey had developed advanced & interlocking
survival skills, the new evolutionary line responded with the concomitant
expansions of cognitive skills, group size, & effective communicative
behavior that eventually led to the emergence of language. Pre- &
post-language communicative behavior is distinguished primarily by language
change; ie, language has the unique property among communicative behaviors
of rapid change due to social & cultural factors instead of slow change
through natural selection. Three successive evolutionary milestones led to
the crystallization of language: first, the creation of symbols with
meaning, ie, context-independent reference to concrete objects; second, the
creation of signals symbolizing events & actions; & third, the growth of
the symbol inventory to a critical mass of several hundred units, after
which only a few generations would have sufficed to develop a full-fledged
language with a grammar having the properties of a first-generation creole.
43 References. J. Hitchcock
-
On the Evolutionary Origin of Language
Li, Charles N; Hombert, Jean-Marie MIRROR NEURONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, Stamenov, Maxim I., & Gallese, Vittorio [Eds],
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp 175-205 A proposed origin of language no
earlier than 60,000-80,000 years ago is supported by arguing that language
was the motivating factor behind exponential increases in population, tool
variety, & the sophistication of art & the settlement of Australia & New
Guinea, which required the ability to traverse deep, fast-moving bodies of
water. In addition to gradual evolutionary processes of reduction of the
gastrointestinal tract, enlargement of the vertebral canal, descent of the
larynx, & increased encephalization, three evolutionary mechanisms are held
to underlie the emergence of language: the duplication of homeotic genes,
the slowing of the human developmental clock, & the causal role of
behavior, particularly social learning, in evolution. It is contended that
the generative paradigm in contemporary linguistics has misled evolutionary
scientists, as the introspective data on which generative grammar is based
represents a very recent development - literacy - whereas the language that
evolved 60,000 years ago is most closely approximated by authentic,
unedited data of casual, everyday spoken language. 1 Figure, 51 References.
J. Hitchcock
-
The Gradual Emergence of Language
MacWhinney, Brian THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE OUT OF PRE-LANGUAGE, Givon,
T., & Malle, Bertram F. [Eds], Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp
233-263 Although language resulted from the introduction of phonological
contrasts over a period from 200,000 to 50,000 years ago, it involved the
construction of a system that uses the entire brain by integrating a series
of abilities representing adaptations over a much longer period, beginning
4-8 million years ago with the emergence of bipedalism. Four periods of
coevolution are implicated: (1) bipedalism, which stimulated neural
modifications for perspective-taking with respect to manual actions, motor
imitation, & action planning; (2) vocal support for social cohesion,
requiring cerebral reorganization for neocortical control of face-to-face
vocalization; (3) the elaboration of mimesis & theory of mind, beginning
circa 2 million years ago & requiring a major expansion of brain volume to
store holistic mimetic sequences; & (4) systematization of language through
the development of neural linkages to make new use of expanded brain volume
by integrating cognitive systems, leading to a fundamental alteration of
cognition & social behavior. 98 References. J. Hitchcock
-
The Relation between Language and Theory of Mind in Development and
Evolution
Malle, Bertram F THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE OUT OF PRE-LANGUAGE, Givon,
T., & Malle, Bertram F. [Eds], Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp 265-284 It
is argued that the evolution of the two human faculties of language &
theory of mind took the form of an escalating interaction in which the
emergence of a primitive form of theory of mind enabled that of a primitive
form of language, after which advances in one faculty were repeatedly
required or facilitated by advances in the other. Over a span of perhaps a
few million years, three mutually reinforcing elements of a primitive
theory of mind emerged, each building on the previous one(s): imitative
ability, joint attention, & inferential sensitivity to desires; these
elements, operating together, permitted the predictable association of
objects & gestural or vocal expressions. Increased intragroup communication
using the resulting highly ambiguous communication system necessitated a
more elaborate theory of mind to track interactions & recognize individual
differences, leading to negotiations over expressions that fostered more
precision & complexity in the communication system. 80 References. J.
Hitchcock
-
Mirror Neurons, Vocal Imitation, and the Evolution of Particulate
Speech
Studdert-Kennedy, Michael MIRROR NEURONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF BRAIN AND
LANGUAGE, Stamenov, Maxim I., & Gallese, Vittorio [Eds], Amsterdam: John
Benjamins, pp 207-227 It is hypothesized that mirror neurons of the type
discovered in macaques by Giacomo Rizzolatti et al (1996) exist in humans;
that a mirror neuron system in humans is specialized to support facial
imitation, a uniquely human capacity that involves cross-modal somatotopic
representation & appears in neonates; & that vocal imitation, which appears
at 0:5-0:8, has co-opted the facial mirror system. The articulatory
gestural phonology developed by C. P. Browman & colleagues is outlined, &
evidence is presented from Studdert-Kennedy's previous studies to show that
errors in infants' imitations of words tend largely to involve gestural
timing & amplitude, not activation of articulatory end-effectors. M.
Meltzoff & K. Moore's (1997) active intermodal matching model of facial
imitation is argued to conform well to the requirements of vocal imitation,
with mirror neurons mediating between the perception of facial &
articulatory gestures & the activation of coordinated movement control
structures. The development of arbitrariness & particulateness that
underlies language is attributed to the process of imitation, which entails
the analysis, storage, & reassembly of components of an action. 2 Tables, 3
Figures, 52 References. J. Hitchcock
-
The Language-Thought Partnership: A Bird's Eye View
Millikan, Ruth Garrett Language and Communication, 2001, 21, 2, Apr,
157-166 Two contentions concerning the connection between language &
thought are explored: (1) the intentionality of both language & thought is
defined separately & (2) public language is a necessary component for the
establishment of human thought. After defining the notion of "proper
function" as an object's survival value, it is maintained that
intentionality is not connected to the proper functions of intentional
states & their associated propositions. Similarities between the
stabilizing function, defined as that which urges speakers to continue
using a language device, of language forms & biological functions performed
by bodies are discussed. The example of the dance performed by bees to
indicate the presence of nectar is offered to illustrate the connection
between the intentionality of biological functions & language. The need to
comprehend the derived stabilizing functions of thought to understand the
intentionality of thought is explained. In addition, the significance of
language in establishing empirical concepts is considered; nevertheless, it
is suggested that determining whether language originated prior to thought
requires additional attention. 9 References. J. W. Parker
-
Rank and Relationships in the Evolution of Spoken Language
Locke, John L Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2001, 7, 1,
Mar, 37-50 If evolutionary benefits associated with language were
predominantly referential, as many theorists assume, then there must have
been a preparatory stage in which an "appetite" for information, not
evident in the other primates, developed. To date, no such stage has been
demonstrated. The problem dissipates, however, if it is assumed that
language emerged from a function more nearly shared with other primates. An
obvious candidate is displaying. Here, I argue that performative functions
associated with oral sound-making provided initial pressures for vocal
communication by promoting rank & relationships. These benefits, I suggest,
facilitated conflict avoidance & resolution, collaboration, & reciprocal
sharing of needed resources. By valuing the performative applications of
language, which continue in modern humans, one can more easily derive
speech from the social-vocal behaviors of nonhuman primates, providing
greater continuity in accounts of linguistic evolution. 106 References.
Adapted from the source document
-
On the Role of Bridge Theories in Accounts of the Evolution of Human
Language
Botha, Rudolf P Language and Communication, 2001, 21, 1, Jan, 61-71 The
evident paucity in the work on the evolution of language has been addressed
by various strategies, including W. K. Wilkins's & J. Wakefield's (1995)
reliance on paleoneurological data as the basis for their arguments
concerning which species was the first to possess language capacity. The
ontological gap is crossed by three small inferential jumps: (1) from data
about the impressions on the interior of fossil skulls, inferences about
the sulcal patterns of ancestral brains are drawn; (2) from hypotheses
about the sulcal patterns are drawn inferences about neuroanatomical
organization; & (3) from theories of neuroanatomy are derived theories
about the brain's functional organization in general & the presence of the
language capacity in particular. A distinct bridge theory is required for
each of these inferential jumps, since they span different ontological
domains: properties of fossil skulls & properties of the language capacity.
Wilkins & Wakefield's localizational theory is reported to have been
faulted by Behavioral and Brain Sciences commentators for assuming an
overly detailed knowledge of brain function, a simple "localized" anatomy
of cognitive functions, & a neuroanatomical map for the association of
functions with neuroanatomical areas, as well as more specific oversights.
In any account of the evolution of any aspect of the language capacity, not
only a theory of language evolution, but also one or more bridge theories,
must be included. Whereas bridge theories are obligatory components of
historical accounts of language evolution, as the existing ones are poorly
articulated or unjustified, the development of new bridge theories is
indicated. 19 References. L. R. Hunter
-
Human Language and Our Reptilian Brain: The Subcortical Bases of Speech,
Syntax, and Thought
Lieberman, Philip Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 2001, 44, 1,
winter, 32-51 A summary of Lieberman's book, Human Language and Our
Reptilian Brain: The Subcortical Bases of Speech, Syntax, and Thought
(Cambridge, MA: Harvard U Press, 2000), treats speech as central to human
linguistic ability & claims that speech & syntax are learned skills
regulated by a functional neural system that involves subcortical
structures, specifically basal ganglia, in a distributed network of the
same type that regulates other complex behaviors, eg, reaching for an
object. The basal ganglia function to sequence the pattern generators that
govern motor activity & cognitive behaviors, & specific behaviors
(including problem solving & syntactic parsing) result from the activity of
circuits linking segregated populations of neurons in various subcortical &
neocortical parts of the brain. Voice onset disturbances in Broca's aphasia
& syntax-linked sentence comprehension deficits in Broca's aphasia &
Parkinson's disease are held to reflect sequencing impairments & therefore
to have a subcortical locus, & both manual motor control & verbal working
memory are shown to involve circuits linking Broca's area to basal ganglia.
Both language & bipedal walking are learned skills dependent on the same
basal ganglia structures; both are degraded in Parkinson's disease, & the
circuits responsible for language & other cognitive acts are likely to have
their evolutionary origin in the development of bipedalism. 63 References.
J. Hitchcock
-
The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain: A Review of Two Contrastive
Views (Pinker & Deacon)
Christensen, Ken Ramshoj Grazer Linguistische Studien, 2001, 55, spring,
1-20 A comparison of accounts of the relationship between language &
evolution, proposed by Steven Pinker in The Language Instinct (London,
1994) & Terrence Deacon in The Symbolic Species. The Co-evolution of
Language and the Human Brain (London, 1997), addresses the "what," "where,"
"why," & "how" questions of language: (1) What is language? (2) Where is
language in the brain? & (3) Why & how did language come to be reflected in
the architecture of the brain? Charles Darwin's (1859) & Mark Baldwin's
(1895) versions of human evolution are also compared, & the implications
for language from Darwinian vs Baldwinian selection models are considered.
The differences between language & nonlinguistic communication are explored
while addressing the species specificity of language. The question of
whether language is localized vs distributed in the brain is reexamined
using empirical data from the literature & addressing lateralization.
Pinker's & Deacon's answers to the "where," "why," & "how," questions are
presented in outline, & the issues raised by both models are identified.
Some conclusions are reached regarding how the principal questions posed in
the debate on language & brain can be answered. 2 Figures, 31 References.
Z. Dubiel
-
Newmeyer on Chomsky in Relation to the Origin and Evolution of
Language
Longa, Victor M Verba, 2001, 28, 391-401 A critical analysis of F.
Newmeyer's (1998) discussion of Noam Chomsky's position on the origin &
evolution of language charges that Newmeyer has failed to appreciate or
even comprehend the significance of the minimalist program, which, in
eliminating highly structured representations internal to the syntax & the
complex machinery necessary for their integration, has also eliminated the
arbitrariness & capriciousness of the relation between the
articulatory-perceptual & conceptual-intentional modules of cognition.
Newmeyer wrongly imputes to Chomsky the notion that language is an abrupt
outcome of result of neuron packing, whereas Chomsky's view of language as
an optimally designed system clearly implies that it arose from the
productive union of the preexistent cognitive modules; Newmeyer is also
wrong to see a contradiction between the derivative origin of the language
faculty & its autonomy. 30 References. Adapted from the source document
-
The Evolution of Language: Truth and Lies
Clark, Stephen R L Philosophy, 2000, 75, 293, July, 401-421 To address
the puzzle of what type of consciousness could have preceded the emergence
of language & how individuals with such a consciousness could have agreed
to the conventions necessary for language, the apparent philosophical
impossibility of natural language is resolved by appeal to prelinguistic
public icons or ideograms as the locus for the development of a
subject-predicate syntax. It is suggested that hominids first created a
system of public images resembling a pidgin to call attention to elements
of reality, memory, & hope; at some point, a still unspecified mutation
produced children who converted their pidgin input into a system resembling
a creole that had the same evolutionary utility as a modern secret language
- it could be used to deceive others around them, particularly adults. The
sharing of fantasy via language made it possible to conceive a distinction
between the obvious world & a so-called real world & thereby to give rise
to the notion of truth. Adapted from the source document
-
On the Relation of Speech to Language
Liberman, Alvin M; Whalen, Doug H Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000, 4,
5(38), May, 187-196 There are two widely divergent theories about the
relation of speech to language. The more conventional view holds that the
elements of speech are sounds that rely for their production & perception
on two wholly separate processes, neither of which is distinctly
linguistic. Accordingly, the primary motor & perceptual representations are
inappropriate for linguistic purposes until a cognitive process of some
sort has connected them to language & to each other. The less conventional
theory takes the speech elements to be articulatory gestures that are the
primary objects of both production & perception. Those gestures form a
natural class that serves a linguistic function & no other. Therefore,
their representations are immediately linguistic, requiring no cognitive
intervention to make them appropriate for use by the other components of
the language system. The unconventional view provides the more plausible
answers to three important questions: (1) How was the necessary parity
between speaker & listener established & maintained during evolution? (2)
How does speech meet the special requirements that underlie its ability,
unique among natural communication systems, to encode an indefinitely large
number of meanings? (3) What biological properties of speech make it easier
than the reading & writing of its alphabetic transcription? 85 References.
Adapted from the source document
-
Discussing the Evolution of the Assorted Beasts Called Language
Botha, Rudolf P Language and Communication, 2000, 20, 2, Apr, 149-160 A
critique of contributions to Approaches to the Evolution of Language
(Hurford, James, Studdert-Kennedy, & Knight, Chris [Eds], Cambridge:
CU Press, 1998) focuses on the failure of many of the participants
in the 1996 Edinburgh conference on language evolution represented in this
volume to characterize clearly what is meant by language. Eleven
ontologically different uses of the term "language" are exemplified to
reflect the lack of consensus on what language is; it is argued that this
opacity results in disconnected, inconclusive discussions of the continuity
or discontinuity of language evolution & of its gradualness or abruptness.
Resolution of these issues is held to be impossible while opposing sides
differ in their view of language as a communication system vs a mental
entity or their adherence to government & binding theory vs the minimalist
program. 27 References. J. Hitchcock
-
Imitation and the Emergence of Segments
Studdert-Kennedy, Michael Phonetica, 2000, 57, 2-4, Apr-Dec,
275-283 The paper argues that the discrete phonetic segments on which
language is raised are subjective gestural structures that emerge
ontogenetically (& perhaps emerged evolutionarily) from the process of
imitating a quasi-continuous acoustic signal with a neuroanatomically
segmented & somatotopically organized vocal machinery. Evidence cited for
somatotopic organization includes the perceptual salience in the speech
signal of information specifying place of articulation, as revealed both by
sine wave speech & by the pattern of errors in children's early words.
Adapted from the source document
-
The Puzzle of Language Evolution
Steels, Luc Kognitionswissenschaft, 2000, 8, 4, Jan, 143-150 It is
argued that linguistics must again concentrate on the evolutionary nature
of language, so that language models will be more realistic with respect to
natural human languages & will have a greater explanatory force.
Multi-agent systems are proposed as a possible route to develop such
evolutionary models, & an example is given of a concrete experiment in the
origins & evolution of word-meaning based on a multi-agent approach. 5
Figures, 15 References. Adapted from the source document
-
LINGUA EX MACHINA: RECONCILING DARWIN AND CHOMSKY WITH THE HUMAN
BRAIN
Calvin, William H; Bickerton, Derek 298pp, Cambridge: Massachusetts
Instit Technology Press, 2000 Noam Chomsky's universal grammar implies an
innate brain circuitry for syntax. This suggests a large evolutionary step
up to human-level language abilities without the useful-in-themselves
intermediate steps usually associated with Darwinian gradualism. The
macromutations thus suggested are one example of the "deus ex machina"
quality of most attempts to explain the origins of language. A proper
"lingua ex machina" would be a language machine capable of nesting phrases
& clauses inside one another, complete with evolutionary pedigree. This
book consists of 15 Chpts that consider three paths in the development from
ape behaviors to syntax: (1) carryover from reciprocal altruism's cognitive
categories & (2) ballistic movements planning circuits, both of which are
compatible with slow language improvement over a few million years, & (3)
corticocortical coherence, a threshold which, once crossed, allowed
structured thought & talk to become far more fluent & thus a capstone
candidate for what triggered the flowering of art & technology seen late in
hominid evolution, after brain size itself had stopped growing. Focus is on
the transition from simple word association in short sentences
(proto-language) to longer recursively structured sentences (requiring
syntax), with emphasis on invention via sidesteps (Darwinian conversions of
function), not straight-line gradual improvements. Glossary. Adapted from
the source document
-
Secret Language Use at Female Initiation: Bonding Gossiping
Communities
Power, Camilla THE EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENCE OF LANGUAGE: SOCIAL FUNCTION
AND THE ORIGINS OF LINGUISTIC FORM, Knight, Chris, Studdert-Kennedy,
Michael, & Hurford, James R. [Eds], England: CU Press, 2000, pp
81-98 In light of R. I. M. Dunbar's proposals regarding the value of
gossip for group bonding among early humans, ethnographic accounts of
female initiation rituals in three Bantu-speaking societies (Venda, Bemba,
& Kpe) are examined with focus on the integration of secret language with
ritual as a solution to the problem of free-riding, ie, the need to exclude
individuals whose gossip is unreliable. Coercive initiation of pubescent
females is held to manifest tension between pregnant & nursing females &
their younger competitors for male provisioning; the high personal costs of
initiation function as a demonstration of personal commitment to the older
group, to be rewarded later when the initiate becomes a nursing mother. As
gossip requires a relationship of trust, the speech of the individual
becomes an object of testing; initiates are secluded & taught special terms
& formulas that must be recited on demand as a costly countermechanism to
free-riding. 40 References. J. Hitchcock
-
From Potential to Realization: An Episode in the Origin of
Language
Comrie, Bernard Linguistics, 2000, 38, 5(369), 989-1004 What kind of
input is necessary for a creature that has the linguistic potential of a
human being actually to realize that potential? Various scenarios are
investigated on the basis of the empirical evidence available, including
feral children (who receive no input & do not develop language); & creoles,
twin languages, & deaf sign languages (where it seems, clearly in the case
of deaf sign languages, only on certain approaches in the case of creoles,
that provision of a lexicon is sufficient for the development of a fully
fledged language). It is concluded that provision of a lexicon - with as
its initial stage the recognition that linguistic signs can be arbitrary -
plays a surprisingly important role in the minimal requirements for
linguistic development & that cognitive prerequisites must be supplemented
by social ones. 23 References. Adapted from the source document
-
How Protolanguage Became Language
Bickerton, Derek THE EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENCE OF LANGUAGE: SOCIAL FUNCTION
AND THE ORIGINS OF LINGUISTIC FORM, Knight, Chris, Studdert-Kennedy,
Michael, & Hurford, James R. [Eds], England: CU Press, 2000, pp
264-284 A new theory of the evolution of syntax posits the prior
existence of a social calculus to implement reciprocal altruism among
primates by tracking the behaviors of group members; such a calculus,
antedating the pongid-hominid split, would require episodic memory & store
in it abstract representations of events & participants. Basic clause &
phrase structure resulted from the mapping of the thematic structure of the
social calculus onto the utterances of a structureless protolanguage. The
estimated two million years during which protolanguage coexisted with the
social calculus before the appearance of syntax is accounted for by
reviewing the neural requirements that basic syntax shares with other
uniquely human abilities, including rhythmic drumming, tap dancing, &
representational drawing: all depend on the long-term maintenance of
coherent neural firing patterns without external stimulus or reinforcement,
& human behaviors shared with other species do not have this requirement.
Once the hominid brain could sustain coherent neural signals through a
sufficient number of merge operations, the template of the social calculus
was immediately accessible to linguistic processing. 51 References. J.
Hitchcock
-
Comprehension, Production and Conventionalisation in the Origins of
Language
Burling, Robbins THE EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENCE OF LANGUAGE: SOCIAL FUNCTION
AND THE ORIGINS OF LINGUISTIC FORM, Knight, Chris, Studdert-Kennedy,
Michael, & Hurford, James R. [Eds], England: CU Press, 2000, pp
27-39 A novel perspective on the evolution of language is argued to
follow naturally from two familiar observations regarding both human &
animal communication: (1) comprehension is always more advanced than
production, & (2) instrumental behavior is often interpretable in the
absence of an intention to communicate. The ability of particular apes to
comprehend a considerable amount of spoken language is held to be evidence
of a degree of linguistic ability usually considered to be exclusively
human. The question of what motivated the first speaker if his/her
productions could not be understood by others is answered by adopting the
view that communication begins with the interpretation of another's
behavior as a sign; comprehension is favored by selective pressures,
whereas the production of signals is often disadvantageous. The
conventionalization of instrumental acts in humans & chimpanzees is
reviewed in this context; a typology of communication forms distinguishes
ontogenetically conventionalized gestures & noises from human & mammalian
gesture-calls, which developed through phylogenetic ritualization, & from
words, signs, & quotable gestures & noises, all of which develop by
imitation. The origin of language is to be sought in improved mutual
comprehension, which leads to exploitation by deliberately informative
behavior. 1 Table, 12 References. J. Hitchcock
-
The Distinction between Sentences and Noun Phrases: An Impediment to
Language Evolution?
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew THE EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENCE OF LANGUAGE: SOCIAL
FUNCTION AND THE ORIGINS OF LINGUISTIC FORM, Knight, Chris,
Studdert-Kennedy, Michael, & Hurford, James R. [Eds], England: CU
Press, 2000, pp 248-263 On the assumption that the pathways of evolution
can be illuminated by accidental evolutionary residues, eg, nerve fibers
covering the retina of the vertebrate eye & the configuration of mammalian
sperm ducts, implications of an analogous residue in language are explored.
The universal syntactic distinction between sentences & noun phrases (NPs),
encoding a semantic distinction between asserting & referring respectively,
is shown to be unnecessary in a comprehensible artificial variant of
English & is argued to reflect the origin of syntax in the cooption of the
neural mechanism that imposes syllable structure on speech; whereas
sentences are parallel to syllables, NPs are parallel to syllabic margins.
Early syntax, by this account, lacked recursion & embedding & was therefore
more restricted than the cognitive capacity of hominids, a serious mismatch
reflected in archaeological evidence for the stagnation of technological
development during the long Homo erectus phase. It is suggested that
recursivity may have emerged as a dependent effect of an eventual
generalization of the awkward syllable-based syntax to sentence-internal
elements. 26 References. J. Hitchcock
-
Language and Hominid Politics
Dessalles, Jean-Louis THE EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENCE OF LANGUAGE: SOCIAL
FUNCTION AND THE ORIGINS OF LINGUISTIC FORM, Knight, Chris,
Studdert-Kennedy, Michael, & Hurford, James R. [Eds], England: CU
Press, 2000, pp 62-80 As success in all human societies is dependent on
the ability to form coalitions & acquire status, it is suggested that the
origin of language may lie in group-on-group conflict between coalitions,
favoring a diminution of in-group violence & manipulative signaling & an
increase in individuals' contributions of relevant information to their
group. The group rewards relevant information by conferring status on its
provider; individuals therefore compete to have their information regarded
as the most relevant & to discredit the information of other group members.
Listeners, not speakers, have the responsibility to detect cheating &
adjust social status rewards accordingly. Although speaking is not a form
of reciprocal altruism in this view, the strategies of reciprocal altruism
involved in coalitionary activity, particularly the conferral of status by
willingness to form social bonds, are a precondition for speech. 8 Figures,
6 References. J. Hitchcock
-
Introduction: The Emergence of Syntax
Hurford, James R THE EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENCE OF LANGUAGE: SOCIAL FUNCTION
AND THE ORIGINS OF LINGUISTIC FORM, Knight, Chris, Studdert-Kennedy,
Michael, & Hurford, James R. [Eds], England: CU Press, 2000, pp
219-230 An introduction to essays in PART III of this volume - THE
EMERGENCE OF SYNTAX - provides analytic summaries of their content &
compares the perspectives of selected authors with respect to eight
overarching themes reflecting the recent tendency in language evolution
studies to recognize that the biological evolution of the language capacity
was entangled with nonbiological evolutionary mechanisms. A gap remains,
however, between broad programmatic proposals regarding language evolution
& the present state of detailed syntactic knowledge, the fragmentation of
which into multiple competing theories is argued to necessitate a search
for new explanatory principles beyond traditional theoretical boundaries.
Structural parallels between levels of language & the character of
semantics in presyntactic protolanguage are discussed in this framework. 1
Table, 9 References. J. Hitchcock
-
Social Transmission Favours Linguistic Generalisation
Hurford, James R THE EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENCE OF LANGUAGE: SOCIAL FUNCTION
AND THE ORIGINS OF LINGUISTIC FORM, Knight, Chris, Studdert-Kennedy,
Michael, & Hurford, James R. [Eds], England: CU Press, 2000, pp
324-352 The role of social transmission in the evolution of syntactic
language is investigated in four simulation experiments drawing on
techniques of J. Batali (1998) & Simon Kirby (2000) to model communities of
four adult speaker/inventors & one child hearer /learner with gradual
population turnover, a meaning space of 4,000 possible meanings, & an
initial languageless state. Despite random inconsistent invention in the
first cycles, experiment 1 showed a gradual reduction of form-meaning
correspondences until the entire community shared the same set, eliminating
synonymy & generalizing syntactic rules. Experiment 2 manipulated the
probability of particular meanings, which as expected persisted as idioms
alongside general rules. In experiment 3, although the tendency to
generalize was weakened, rote-learned sequences conformed to the ordering
rules of the resulting community language, suggesting that linguists'
economizing generalizations pertain to E-languages, not I-languages.
Experiment 4 added a restructuring operation to reduce meaning
representations into binary bracketed structures, producing a convergence
on a single binary rule instead of separate rules for one-, two-, &
three-place predicates. 6 Tables, 1 Figure, 16 References. J. Hitchcock
-
The Evolution of Sex Differences in Language, Sexuality, and
Visual-Spatial Skills
Joseph, R Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2000, 29, 1, Feb, 35-66 The
evolutionary neurological & physical foundations for human sex differences
in language, sexuality, & visual spatial skills are detailed, & primate &
human studies are reviewed. Trends in the division of labor were
established early in evolution & became amplified with the emergence of the
"big brained" Homo erectus. A bigger brain necessitated a size increase in
the birth canal & female pelvis. These & other physical changes, eg, the
swelling of the breasts & buttocks, may have paralleled the evolution of
full-time sexual receptivity, the establishment of the home base, &
exaggerated sex differences in the division of labor (hunting vs
gathering), which in turn promoted innate sex differences in visual spatial
vs language skills. For example, female primates produce more social &
emotional vocalizations & engage in more tool use & gathering activities,
whereas males tend to hunt & kill. Similar labor divisions are evident over
the course of human evolution. "Woman's work" such as child rearing,
gathering, & domestic tool construction & manipulation contributed to the
functional evolution of Broca's speech area & the angular gyrus, which
injects temporal sequences & complex concepts into the stream of language &
thought. These activities gave rise, therefore, to a female superiority in
grammatical (temporal sequential) vocabulary-rich language. Hunting as a
way of life does not require speech but requires excellent visual-spatial
skills &, thus, contributed to a male visual-spatial superiority & sex
difference in the brain. Over the course of evolution males acquired modern
human speech through genetic inheritance & because they had mothers who
taught them language. 5 Figures, 326 References. Adapted from the source
document
-
The Spandrels of the Linguistic Genotype
Lightfoot, David THE EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENCE OF LANGUAGE: SOCIAL FUNCTION
AND THE ORIGINS OF LINGUISTIC FORM, Knight, Chris, Studdert-Kennedy,
Michael, & Hurford, James R. [Eds], England: CU Press, 2000, pp
231-247 Characteristics of universal grammar are explained in the context
of current debate over the exclusive vs nonexclusive role of natural
selection in evolution; physical laws limiting evolutionary change are
illustrated by scaling relations in plants & animals, & the possibility of
nonadaptive changes as by-products of adaptive changes is introduced. One
element of universal grammar is claimed to be dysfunctional, ie,
nonadaptive: a general requirement that all traces head the complement of
an adjacent word blocks useful wh-movement from the subject of finite
clauses, motivating a variety of circumventing strategies in different
languages - complementizer deletion, resumptive pronoun use, & complex
subject movement. A review of the implementation of these strategies in a
wide range of languages attests the human need to extract subjects for
reasons of expressibility & shows that the fixed subject constraint is a
nonadaptive by-product of another change. 28 References. J. Hitchcock
-
Words, Memes and Language Evolution
Worden, Robert P THE EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENCE OF LANGUAGE: SOCIAL FUNCTION
AND THE ORIGINS OF LINGUISTIC FORM, Knight, Chris, Studdert-Kennedy,
Michael, & Hurford, James R. [Eds], England: CU Press, 2000, pp
353-371 The notion of memes, defined in the selfish-gene theory of R.
Dawkins (1976) as units of cultural inheritance analogous to genes &
subject to natural selection, is incorporated in a theory of language
learning in which word memes evolve by a mechanism of precise word
replication that propagates word information across generations. In a
unification-based framework, word senses are represented in the brain as a
tree-like feature structure comprising the phonology, syntax, & semantics
of the word & are replicated by feature structure generalization from the
unified derivation structures of utterances. The learning process of
unification & generalization is analogous to DNA replication, & the
evolution of word feature structures over generations is shaped by factors
determining their fitness: useful meaning, productivity, economy, ease of
learning, unambiguousness, & social identification. These selection
pressures are shown to create prominent features of languages, including
semantic role selection, the encoding of meanings in verbs of motion, the
Greenberg-Hawkins universals, & the blend of regularity & irregularity
found in all languages. 1 Table, 4 Figures, 20 References. Adapted from the
source document
-
Holistic Utterances in Protolanguage: The Link from Primates to
Humans
Wray, Alison THE EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENCE OF LANGUAGE: SOCIAL FUNCTION AND
THE ORIGINS OF LINGUISTIC FORM, Knight, Chris, Studdert-Kennedy, Michael, &
Hurford, James R. [Eds], England: CU Press, 2000, pp 285-302 In
light of the holistic character of nonhuman primate communication & the
abundance & heavy communicative burden of holistic utterances in human
interactions, it is hypothesized that holistic processing has continued
uninterrupted through the evolutionary stages of primate communication,
protolanguage, & full human language. The formulaic component of the
latter, which meets selectional requirements of social communication by
implementing the majority of perlocutionary speech acts in everyday life,
exists side by side with the newly evolved analytic language system, which
is seriously misaligned with communicative needs. The emergence of the
grammatical faculty has little to do with social communication & is more
plausibly understood as a way to organize thought & planning via
referentiality, hierarchical structure, & concepts at the level of what
would become words; the original function of the phonological loop is
viewed in this context as an extra memory capacity facilitating complex
thought. 4 Figures, 37 References. J. Hitchcock
-
The Neurethology of Primate Vocal Communication: Substrates for the
Evolution of Speech
Ghazanfar, Asif A; Hauser, Marc D Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1999, 3,
10(31), Oct, 377-384 In this article, we review behavioral &
neurobiological studies of the perception & uses of species-specific
vocalizations by non-human primates. At the behavioral level, primate vocal
perception shares many features with speech perception by humans. These
features include a left-hemisphere bias toward conspecific vocalizations,
the use of temporal features for identifying different calls, & the use of
calls to refer to objects & events in the environment. The putative neural
bases for some of these behaviors have been revealed by recent studies of
the primate auditory & prefrontal cortices. These studies also suggest
homologies with the human language circuitry. Thus, a synthesis of
cognitive, ethological & neurobiological approaches to primate vocal
behavior is likely to yield the richest understanding of the neural bases
of speech perception, & might also shed light on the evolutionary
precursors to language. 3 Figures, 66 References. Adapted from the source
document
-
GROOMING, GOSSIP, AND THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE
Dunbar, Robin 230pp, Cambridge, MA: Harvard U Press, 1996 This book
contains 10 Chpts that explore the role of social group interaction in the
development of the human language ability. Human socialization is compared
to the grooming habits of nonhuman primates in an effort to explain the
emergence of language. Primate grooming serves to establish & maintain
relational bonds within the group, but such behaviors are effective only
with limited numbers of individuals. It is argued that early human language
replaced grooming as a more efficient method of building social order &
alliances, rather than developing primarily as a communicative tool in
complex tasks, eg, hunting. The limitations of modern language in human
group dynamics & information technologies are considered as well. 4
Figures, Bibliog. L. Lucht
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |